A figure of 0.000184 has no material difference in value, I suggest neither does 0.00018 and I bet that no one would care were this rounded by the algorithm to 0.0002. I am forced, for sanity's sake, to give away the dust to the miners using the OP_RETURN mechanism. The most recent versions of Electrum use dynamic fees.
The miners may or may not be able to profit from the dust they collect, I don't know and I don't mind too much as long as the dust is not being created systematically and deliberately! The OP_RETURN mechanism could be made a little easier to use in Electrum, but that too is not my complaint. I appreciate this may seem similar to a recently raised issue of mine. I partially accept the answer - that there is a fault with the coin selection mechanism when 'max' is clicked. You can then right click on a 'low fee' tx in the history and select 'Child pays for parent'. I think there is a problem with that algorithm even when 'max' is not clicked. You then have a fee slider with 'within 2 blocks' pre-selected from a dynamic fee. You will now see a preview window for the transaction. Electrum Premium Tattoo Skin Prep & Stencil Repositioner does exactly what its called. Click sign and broadcast the signed transaction and the fee is bumped.
Use for prepping the skin prior to tattooing to remove those surface. The wrong coins are being selected leaving behind dust as change. This is encouraged by these exquisitely finely defined fees.
